God's Own Party:
Oral Surgery
by
Matthew Avery Sutton
On October 9, Richard Roberts told CNN’s Larry King that a lawsuit leveled
against him was “the most unusual thing I’ve ever witnessed in my life.” As
the son of the pioneering Pentecostal faith healer and televangelist Oral
Roberts, this is a man who has witnessed some unusual things.
The mirror image of his father, Richard Roberts stood beside him in 1977 as
Oral told reporters that he had seen a 900-foot-tall Jesus. Richard also
claims to have seen the resurrection of a child from the dead in response to
his father’s prayers, and he supported his dad when Oral told the world in
1987 that God was going to kill him if he did not raise $8 million for a new
medical complex.
Indeed, Richard Roberts has been near religious controversy throughout his
life. This time, however, it is he—not Oral—who has been at the center of
the storm.
In recent years, Richard has helped his father run Oral Roberts University
(ORU), which Roberts père opened in 1965 for the purpose of educating
a new generation of Pentecostal and charismatic leaders. It has become one
of the premier Pentecostal liberal arts colleges in the nation, with a
current enrollment of over 5,700 students.
Oral is the school’s chancellor, while Richard served until recently as
president, running the day-to-day operations. The school is facing serious
financial difficulties, and the new lawsuit has put all that the Robertses
have built in jeopardy.
On October 2, three former ORU professors sued Richard Roberts, other
university officials, and the school itself, claiming that they were
wrongfully forced out of their positions. The plaintiffs were John Swails,
former chair of the department of history, humanities, and government, who
had taught at ORU for 14 years; Tim Brooker, who had taught government at
ORU for six years; and Brooker’s wife Paulita, an adjunct at ORU for three
years.
According to them, the university violated federal law by engaging in
partisan politics. Things have changed a lot since the early 20th century,
when Pentecostals largely eschewed secular political activity. Today they
are major players on the Religious Right, and for many, the Republican Party
is their home.
Seeking to capitalize on this relationship, the Republican National
Committee (RNC) created a program that provided ORU students with course
credit for working on political campaigns. To keep the school from violating
Internal Revenue rules prohibiting non-profit organizations from engaging in
partisan political activity, the RNC picked up all expenses. Initially, the
students worked only on out-of-state races because university leaders did
not want to alienate the school’s neighbors.
According to Tim Brooker, who was in charge of the program, Richard Roberts
decided in the winter of 2005 that it was time to break with that policy. He
wanted Brooker’s students to help Randi Miller become the Republican
candidate for mayor of Tulsa in 2006. Not only did Miller fail to win the
GOP primary, but her race attracted the attention of the IRS, which launched
an investigation to determine if ORU had broken the law. Brooker claims that
Roberts forced him to assume responsibility for the debacle, even though he
had opposed it from the beginning.
To make matters worse, students working on the ill-fated campaign had access
to a computer normally used by Richard Roberts’ sister-in-law, Stephanie
Cantees, who worked for the Roberts ministry as community and government
liaison. On it they stumbled upon a report compiled by Cantees that detailed
potential areas of Roberts family vulnerability. Hoping to protect Richard’s
political clout, Cantees had been recording negative stories and rumors
related to the family. “I asked her some years ago if she would be eyes and
ears to me and tell me what was going on,” Richard told Larry King. “From
time to time, she would make notes from things that she heard and she would
always write them down. And then she would bring them to me.”
The students showed the Cantees report to Brooker, who along with John
Swails turned it over to university administrators. Rather than deal with
the allegations contained in the document, the administrators allegedly
forced the professors out, hoping to cover up the report. For her part,
Paulita Brooker says that she was fired for reporting an incident of sexual
harassment on the part of another professor.
The report disclosed that the Roberts family used university funds for
vacations and personal luxuries. Richard Roberts, who was receiving a
$228,000 salary from the university (the family’s total income for all
ministry work was $673,000 annually), purportedly booked speaking
engagements in beautiful locations so that he could bring his wife and
children along, turning legitimate university travel into family vacations
at the school’s expense.
Roberts said that he always reimbursed the school for these trips. Yet a
former senior accountant at the university disagreed, claiming that he was
instructed to cook the books to hide the Roberts’ personal expenses. (He has
filed his own wrongful termination lawsuit.)
The original lawsuit also alleges that extensive and repeated remodeling was
done on the Roberts’ university-owned home; that the university paid for a
stable and horses for their children; and that Roberts’ daughters had free
rein on the campus. Apparently, they were not disciplined for crashing
university golf carts or for vandalizing athletic equipment.
As frustrating as these claims might be to university students and alumni,
the alleged fraud was not in the same league as that of Jim Bakker 20 years
ago. For today’s televangelists, the amount of spending by the Roberts
family, said by the lawsuit to run into the tens of thousands of dollars,
constitutes little more than chump change. But because it came from tuition
payments, not “love offerings,” students and the local community were
outraged.
Nor did it help that the Robertses had close ties to prosperity gospel
ministers—the true vultures in the religion business. The prosperity gospel
teaches that Jesus was rich and that God wants all of his people to be
materially prosperous. It promises followers that they can attain wealth
through demonstrations of faith, usually by donating beyond their means to
prosperity gospel ministers.
On November 5, in the midst of the breaking ORU scandal, Iowa Senator
Charles Grassley, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, opened
an investigation into the misuse of funds by six of these
prosperity-preaching televangelists. Three of his targets—Kenneth Copeland,
Benny Hinn, and the aptly named Creflo Dollar—served on the ORU board of
regents. Dollar has since resigned, and Hinn has become a “regent emeritus”
without voting privileges.
Richard Roberts initially responded to the lawsuit with denials, assuming
the now common persona of the persecuted televangelist doing Jesus’ work
while dogged by the devil and his minions. According to the Tulsa World,
he called a campus-wide meeting to pray “against all enemies”; accused the
three professors who had filed the lawsuit of blackmail and extortion; and
invoked the words of Jesus by saying that he would “pray for those who
persecute and despitefully use us.” Then he and his wife Lindsay went on
Larry King Live to defend themselves.
Their actions provoked additional revelations. The initial lawsuit contained
an obscure line that referred to thousands of text messages sent by Lindsay
Roberts to “underage” males in the middle of the night over a period of a
few months. While the plaintiffs originally omitted this information from
their filing, after the Robertses went on the offensive, they filed an
amended complaint that included the entire document retrieved from the
Cantees computer.
According to the document, 51-year-old Lindsay had a 16-year-old boyfriend
who on multiple occasions had spent the night with her at the university
guest house. Eventually, the boyfriend even moved into the Roberts’ family
home.
Lindsay denied these assertions and the alleged boyfriend said he was
actually dating the Roberts’ youngest daughter. He claimed that there was
nothing sexual about his relationship with Lindsay and that the late-night
car rides and text messages were the result of Lindsay’s willingness to
minister to and mentor a troubled teen. But on October 17, in the face of
the salacious revelations, Roberts took a leave of absence from the
university (but not from his position atop the Oral Roberts Ministries
empire).
Notwithstanding Roberts’ claims to the contrary, members of the OSU Board of
Regents were not confident that the lawsuit was frivolous. Shortly after
learning of it (before it went public), they hired an independent auditor to
open the books. Almost immediately, it became clear that they were more
interested in preserving the school than in saving Richard’s reputation.
Surprisingly, Roberts received almost no public pledges of support. Regents
chairman George Pearsons, himself the son-in-law of prosperity preacher and
televangelist Kenneth Copeland, told the Tulsa World on October 18
that he hoped that the Robertses would be cleared, but that “if it’s the
other way around, we’ll have to make decisions accordingly.” On November 12,
a month after the story broke, the ORU faculty voted “no confidence” in
Roberts.
Regardless of the outcome of the lawsuit, professors did not want him back
and on November 18 more than 80 percent of them expressed opposition to his
return. On November 24, after the provost vowed to resign if the board
reinstated him, Roberts tendered his resignation.
The scandal convulsed the media in Tulsa, where the World’s April
Marciszewski and the AP’s Justin Juozapavicius were the reporters on the
beat. Nationally, the story was covered by the New York Times and the
Los Angeles Times as well as by Larry King, who has made something of
a specialty of covering evangelical celebrities.
The World took a carefully balanced approach to the story, covering
its twists and turns closely while posting the major documents on its
website. The paper views ORU’s overall roll in the local community in a
positive light—scarcely surprising given the jobs and students it provides
to the local economy.
Unfortunately, however, reporters were unable to get behind this story. Most
of the coverage did little more than summarize public documents and
carefully crafted press releases issued by the major participants. There
were no significant scoops and little revealed by insiders, on or off the
record, about the major charges and counter claims. As of mid-December,
there were still many unresolved questions, including the extent of the
Roberts’ spending, the nature of Lindsay’s relationship with the teenager,
and the role that Oral is playing behind the scenes.
Whatever emerges, the lawsuit has exposed problems inherent in many
Pentecostal ministries. In the latter part of the 20th century, Americans
witnessed the decline of traditional denominations and the rise of populist
celebrity ministers who almost singlehandedly built themselves religious
empires. Many of these entrepreneurs were skeptical of the nation’s colleges
and universities, viewing them as secular institutions hostile to Christian
values.
As a result, they established their own. Some of these, including Pat
Robertson’s Regent University, the Assemblies of God’s Vanguard University,
and ORU itself have become respected, fully accredited, Christian-oriented,
liberal arts institutions.
These schools, however, are facing generational conflicts. Younger faculty
members, who have often trained in the country’s top universities, quickly
grow frustrated with the hierarchical polity established by their
predecessors.
Dictatorial tactics cannot sustain the ministries that they built,
especially as the charismatic founders retire or pass away. After years of
authoritarian domination under Richard, ORU professors are fighting back.
They seem much less interested in preserving the “Oral Roberts” than the
“University” in the school’s title. Students also seem to be unsure about
what to make of the accusations. Some have begun organizing their own
lawsuits against the university, claiming that they were defrauded of
tuition dollars and that their degrees have lost value.
When the story broke, one recent alumnus expressed little surprise, telling
the World’s Marciszewski that in “the whole charismatic
movement…stuff like this seems to always happen.” Why is it that of all
religious groups, Pentecostal and charismatic ministers (including Jim
Bakker, Jimmy Swaggart, and Ted Haggard) seem to be particularly
scandal-prone?
Because of the movement’s ecstatic practices, including faith healing and
speaking in tongues, there has long been a seeming aura of heightened
sexuality in Pentecostalism. John Steinbeck, for example, opened his 1939
classic the Grapes of Wrath with a Pentecostal evangelist who
explained, “I use ta get the people jumpin’ an’ talkin’ in tongues, an’
glory-shoutin’ till they just fell down an’ passed out….An’ then you know
what I’d do? I’d take one of them girls out in the grass, an’ I’d lay with
her.”
But the explanation may have less to do with some intrinsic inclination
toward sexual sin and financial impropriety than the Pentecostal movement’s
tendency to create celebrity ministers who thrive in the spotlight. No
American religious group can compete with Pentecostals when it comes to
mastering mass media. They dominate the airwaves.
All religious movements have occasional errant leaders, but because so many
of those who are in the limelight are Pentecostal, their foibles receive a
disproportionate amount of attention. At the same time, Pentecostals have
been terrible at creating systems of financial accountability for their
ministries. Their independent, populist streak and their history of working
outside of traditional denominational structures often make them unwilling
to submit to independent oversight. When you combine the theological
conviction that God wants you to be rich with weak bureaucracies, trouble is
inevitable.
As Richard Roberts’ future at the university started to look dim, his father
left sunny California for Tulsa, vowing that the “devil” would not “steal
ORU.” But when he called a faculty meeting and asked professors to forgive
and start fresh, the plea had little effect. A phone call into Larry King
Live during Richard’s interview may have been his last hurrah—the old
king of televangelism no longer seemed relevant.
Richard, in turn, continued to frame the controversy as a spiritual battle.
The AP’s Juozapavicius reported his claim to have received a “prophecy” six
months earlier indicating that problems were on the horizon. God assured him
that he would come through them stronger than ever. Then, when he resigned,
he claimed that God told him to.
Roberts’ resignation was followed by the announcement that Hobby Lobby
founder Mart Green was giving the school $70 million to help get it back on
track. The next week, the Board of Regents met and began the process of
fully separating the school from the Oral Roberts ministry. It was decided
that Oral and Richard would remain on the board as “spiritual regents”
without voting power or any role in operations.
On December
11, a district court judge ordered the plaintiffs and ORU to begin mediation
to resolve their differences. With an infusion of cash and some new
leadership, Oral Roberts University will probably be just fine. The Roberts
family, however, is most likely out of the education business for good.
|