A Special Supplement to Religion in the News:
High
School Students Speak Out
by
Ariela
Keysar
A solid
grounding in science is widely considered to be crucial for the next
generation of American adults. Yet studies show that although students are
taking more science courses than in the past—at the prodding of teachers and
guidance counselors—they aren’t absorbing much. The average science score at
grade 12 on the National Assessment of Educational Progress test in 2005 was
lower than in 1996, and showed no significant change from 2000.
To learn why,
Trinity College’s Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and
Culture (ISSSC) sponsored an essay contest open to students in all
Connecticut high schools—public, private, and religious—whose question was:
Why do so many young Americans today show little interest in science
education?
The contest
enabled young people, who are generally not heard from directly on issues of
educational policy and practice, to offer insights into the frame of mind of
their own generation. Unlike an opinion survey, the essay contest was not
intended to gather a representative sample of students’ feelings about
science education.
Indeed, far
from being representative, the 81 students who chose to enter the essay
contest were unusually enthusiastic about learning. Many asserted a strong
belief in the value of science education. Nonetheless, all of them accepted
the premise of the contest, which is that many young Americans show little
interest in science education. In answering the question they did not mince
words.
A large number
placed the blame on students themselves. “[Y]outh have grown lazy and
decadent, and refuse to put forth the amount of work necessary to excel in
science,” one essayist wrote.
Part of the
problem, according to a number of essayists, lies with American culture
generally. “Today all that Americans want to do is watch some mindless TV,
and play videogames, with stimulus responses every 5-10 seconds,” wrote one.
“The problem with this is that it creates a society with a very short
attention span.”
Several blamed
their peers for taking technology for granted. Dependent as they are on cell
phones, computers, and iPods, young people aren’t curious about how they
work. As one student observed, “When one can connect to a virtual world with
the flip of a switch, the incentive is lost to go out in the backyard and
build rockets.”
But few said
that students shy away from science because it conflicts with their
religious beliefs. One went so far as to describe science as a way to
appreciate the glory of God, writing, “Personally, I find the view science
gives us of the universe as intriguing as I do because I love my God, the
creator of this universe.”
A recurring
theme was the difficulty of science, which was described as “complicated,
confusing or intimidating.” According to the essays, today’s students
expect everything to be “fun stuff.”
Many of the
high school students also criticized the way science is taught, emphasizing
their desire for more learning by doing. “If there were fewer lectures and
more hands-on experimentation and research where students were interactively
involved, there would be an increase in science…among students,” one wrote.
Others
attributed the lack of interest in science to the belief that careers in
science are relatively low-paying. “What do you do with a science degree?”
one asked. “There aren’t too many people in this world getting rich off the
science industry.” Finally, the mass media came in for blame for not
providing an appealing image of science and portraying scientists as boring
“geeks.”
“Hollywood has
portrayed many nerds as lovers of science,” wrote one essayist. “When most
people think of a scientist, they think of a man in a white lab coat with
hair that is sticking out with electricity going through it holding a beaker
that contains a crazy concoction in it. This isn’t exactly appealing.” |